Pricing Philosophy

No upfront fee. No retainer. You pay from what we can prove we saved you.

A pre-agreed, capped share of measured improvement, computed in your own systems — and nothing at all if the metric doesn't move. Here is exactly how it works, including where it doesn't apply.

The short version

We concentrate on operations where the saving is verified by somebody other than us: a carrier who decides whether to pay a freight claim, a control store the model never touched, a settlement price published hourly. That is what separates this from a marketing slogan. In practice that means freight and logistics, retail and grocery, and energy and utilities - though we will work anywhere the outcome is genuinely measurable.

The guarantee, in one sentence

If the metric we agreed on does not move, you pay us nothing.

Not a discount. Not a partial refund. Not "we'll make it right on the next phase." Nothing.

The Founding Client Program

Here is the part most consultancies would hide: we do not have case studies yet. We are new, and we are not going to invent client results or dress up industry averages as our own track record.

That is the entire reason these terms exist. A firm with ten published case studies can charge a retainer, because its portfolio is the proof. We do not have that, so we offer the only other honest form of proof: we carry the risk ourselves until the results exist. What you get:

We run three performance-based engagements at a time. That is not a marketing device - it is the honest capacity of a small team that has to carry delivery risk on every project it accepts.

Who this is for, and who it is not

A good fit

  • You can name a metric that is measured in money and already tracked in your systems.
  • There is enough decision volume to separate a real effect from noise within months.
  • You can give us access to data that already exists.
  • You would rather be measured than reassured.

A bad fit

  • You want an AI strategy deck or a proof of concept with no operational metric behind it.
  • The outcome cannot be attributed - too little volume, too many simultaneous changes.
  • Data access requires a six-month internal negotiation before anything can start.
  • You need infrastructure or migration work, which we quote fixed-scope instead.

We turn down projects in the second column, and we would rather do it on a free call than after taking your money. Under performance pricing, a project that cannot work costs us more than it costs you.

What it costs you to find out

One call and a look at your data. If the honest answer is that you should buy an off-the-shelf tool, fix a process, or use a spreadsheet, we will tell you that and you will have lost an hour. If the answer is that there is real money in it, you will have a written measurement plan and a build that costs you nothing until it works.

Why we price this way

Most ML consulting is billed hourly or on retainer. Under that model, the consultant gets paid the same whether the model ships and works or dies in a notebook — and industry surveys have put the failure rate of ML initiatives well above half. Hourly billing means the client carries all of that risk.

Performance pricing inverts the incentive. We only earn well when your metric actually moves, which changes our behavior in three concrete ways:

  1. We say no more often. If your data can't support the model, or the honest answer is "use a spreadsheet," we tell you at scoping — because taking the project would cost us money, not make it.
  2. We optimize for the metric, not the deliverable. A slide deck and a trained model are not outcomes. A measured drop in your cost per unit is.
  3. We stay after deployment. Models decay. Since our fee depends on sustained measured improvement, monitoring and retraining are in our interest, not an upsell.

How an engagement runs

  1. Scoping call (free). We identify the metric, look at whether your data can plausibly move it, and say so honestly — including when the answer is that you don't need us.
  2. Baseline and measurement agreement. Before building, we document the current value of the metric, the measurement window, the attribution method, the fee percentage, and the cap. This is a short written document both sides sign.
  3. Build and deploy. Typically 6–12 weeks depending on scope. You see progress against the metric, not just status reports.
  4. Measurement window. The system runs, and improvement is measured on your data with the method agreed in step 2.
  5. Settlement and review. The fee is calculated from the measured lift, capped as agreed, and reviewed at a regular cadence. If the lift isn't there, the performance fee is zero.

How improvement is measured

Attribution is where outcome pricing usually gets slippery, so we fix the method before the build, in writing:

When performance pricing applies — and when it doesn't

Performance pricing is honest only when three conditions hold:

When those conditions fail, we say so and quote fixed-scope instead. Typical fixed-scope work: MLOps infrastructure and deployment pipelines, data platform migrations, exploratory feasibility studies, and compliance-driven projects. Pretending that work is performance-priced would just hide an hourly rate inside a formula.

An illustrative example

Hypothetical arithmetic for illustration — not a client result. We have no client results yet.

A 40-store grocery chain writes off R$18,000 per store per month in fresh-category markdown and disposal — R$8.64M a year across the estate. That 12-month record becomes the documented baseline.

We deploy expiry detection and markdown timing in 20 stores chosen at random; the other 20 continue unchanged as the control group. Over a 13-week measurement window, the model stores average R$15,300 per store per month against the control group's R$17,900 — a gap of R$2,600 per store per month. Because both groups ran through the same weather, the same holidays, and the same supplier problems, that gap is attributable to the system rather than to the season.

Annualized across the 20 model stores, that is R$624,000 of avoided loss. At a hypothetical 20% share, our fee is R$124,800 and the chain keeps R$499,200 — before it rolls the system out to the other 20 stores, where our capped share is already agreed. Had the model stores matched the control group, the arithmetic would be R$0 avoided loss and R$0 owed to us, with the build cost absorbed entirely by us.

Note what does the work in that example: it is not the model, it is the control group. Without it the chain would only know that disposal fell, and would have no way to separate our contribution from a mild summer.

How risk is shared

RiskWho carries itHow
The model never works NexoLogic No measured improvement means no performance fee.
The model works too well and the fee balloons Client — removed by design Every agreement includes a fee cap set upfront.
Disputed attribution Both — removed by design Measurement method fixed in writing before the build, computed on the client's own data.
Market moves for reasons unrelated to the model Shared Holdout comparisons where possible; named external adjustments where not.
Model decays after launch NexoLogic Ongoing fees depend on sustained lift, so monitoring and retraining are in our interest.

Pricing FAQ

How does performance-based pricing work for machine learning consulting?

Before any build starts, both sides agree in writing on one business metric, how its baseline is measured, and how improvement will be attributed to the system. After deployment, you pay a pre-agreed, capped share of the measured improvement over that baseline, calculated from your own data. If the metric doesn't improve, no performance fee is owed.

What happens if the model doesn't deliver results?

Then the performance fee is zero. That is the point of the model: we carry delivery risk instead of you. It also means we decline projects we don't believe will move the metric — which is a useful signal for you during scoping.

How is the improvement measured and attributed?

The measurement plan is agreed before the build. Where volume allows, we use a holdout or A/B comparison. Where it doesn't, we use before/after against the documented baseline, adjusted for seasonality and named external factors. Measurement always runs on your data and dashboards, so you can verify every number.

Is there an upfront cost?

Scoping is free. Depending on the engagement, there may be a small fixed component to cover hard costs such as cloud infrastructure, but the substantial majority of compensation is tied to measured outcomes. The exact split is agreed in writing before work begins.

When do you charge fixed-scope fees instead?

When the work cannot honestly be outcome-measured: MLOps infrastructure builds, migrations, exploratory research, and compliance-driven work. Pretending those are performance-priced would just mean hiding an hourly rate inside a formula. For that work we quote a fixed scope and price upfront.

Do you have case studies or past client results?

No. We are new, and we will not publish case studies we don't have or dress up industry averages as our own track record. That is exactly why our terms are what they are: a firm with a portfolio can charge a retainer because its past results are the proof. We don't have that, so we offer the other honest form of proof - we carry the risk ourselves until the results exist.

What's the catch?

Three real ones, stated openly. We only accept projects where the outcome can be measured and attributed, so we decline vague or exploratory work. We run three performance-based engagements at a time, because we carry delivery risk on each. And if it works, we ask for a named case study and a reference call - that is the actual thing we're trading for these terms.

What does the free profit-leak audit include?

A review of your relevant data and a written measurement plan naming the metric, your current baseline, the attribution method, and what we think we can move it by. It's yours whether or not you hire us - including if you take it to another firm. If the honest conclusion is that a tool, a process fix, or a spreadsheet beats a model, the audit says that.

Why don't more ML consultancies charge based on outcomes?

Because it requires declining projects that are unlikely to work, agreeing to measurable definitions of success, and waiting for results before getting fully paid. Hourly billing transfers all of that risk to the client. Outcome pricing only makes sense for a consultancy confident in its delivery rate and selective about what it takes on.

Want to know if your project qualifies for performance pricing?

Bring your metric to a free scoping call — or try the ML ROI calculator first

Schedule a Scoping Call